LATEST DATA: February 2026 CMS Release
March 19, 2026
LTC Sentinel
Special Report

The State of Long-Term Care in 2026: Recovery, Reshuffling, and Red Flags

An in-depth look at what CMS data reveals about nursing home closures, ownership changes, staffing, and the facilities most at risk.

LTC Sentinel Research · March 19, 2026 · 12 min read

The long-term care industry continues to navigate a shifting landscape. After years of pandemic-driven disruption, the latest CMS data paints a picture that is cautiously optimistic at the national level — but reveals deep trouble brewing at hundreds of individual facilities.

We analyzed three snapshots of CMS Nursing Home Compare data spanning two years (March 2024, October 2025, and February 2026) alongside Payroll Based Journal staffing records, Chain Performance Measures, and Minimum Data Set quality data. Here's what we found.

The Big Picture: Slow Recovery Nationally

-168
Facilities
+34.8K
Residents
+3.1%
Occupancy
2.98★
Avg Rating

Between March 2024 and February 2026, 168 nursing homes left the market — dropping from 14,878 to 14,710 nationally. But the facilities that remain are filling up: total residents climbed from 1.21 million to 1.24 million, pushing average occupancy from 75.9% to 79.0%.

Average star ratings ticked up from 2.87 to 2.98, and total fines dropped significantly — from $566 million to $480 million. On the surface, the industry appears to be stabilizing.

But these national averages mask significant disparity. The closures and the gains are not evenly distributed, and a large cohort of facilities is showing signs of serious trouble.

The Ownership Shuffle: Nearly 2,000 Facilities Changed Hands

One of the most striking findings is the volume of ownership activity. Between March 2024 and February 2026, we identified 1,995 facilities whose legal business name changed — a strong signal of an ownership transfer, sale, or corporate restructuring. On top of that, 11 facilities are currently flagged by CMS as having changed ownership (CHOW) in the past 12 months.

What to watch: Ownership transitions can be a leading indicator of either improvement or instability. The ones with simultaneous low ratings and high fines deserve the closest scrutiny.

Notable Ownership Transfers

FacilityStFromToRatingFines
Polaris Extended CareAKProvidence HealthKorsin Healthcare1★$220K
Nexus PavilionILBelleville HC LLCBelleville HC LP1★$914K
La Bella of WoodstockILCrossroads CareHighlight HC1★$587K
Wilmington NursingDEManor CareWilmington SNF Op1★$409K
Eagle Lake NursingFLBlue RidgeEagle Lake Opco1★$322K
Marianna HealthFLCity of MariannaMarianna Rehab LLC4★$0

Several patterns stand out. In Florida, we see a wave of facilities being transferred to new LLC entities with "Opco" in the name — a structure common in REIT arrangements where operations are separated from property ownership. In Illinois, multiple facilities changed hands while carrying 1-star ratings and six-figure fines.

The Decline Watch: 5,687 Facilities Showing Warning Signs

We built a composite decline score for every facility by tracking census drops, low occupancy rates, rating declines, increasing fines, high turnover, Special Focus Facility status, and abuse flags.

5,687
Decline Signals
50
Critical
137
<50% Occ.

The Most Troubled Facilities

FacilityStBedsCensusOccSignals
Concordia NursingAR1023029%14→1★ · fines $655→$182K · 100% turnover
Regalcare TauntonMA1006464%14→1★ · fines $20K→$342K · abuse flag
Integrity HCIL1314232%132 deficiencies · abuse icon · SFF
Skyline HeightsMT1506644%1Census ↓25% · fines $500K · 84% turnover
Masonic VillageNJ26411142%15→1★ · abuse icon · SFF candidate

Thunderbolt Care Center in Georgia has just 15 residents in a 134-bed facility — an 11% occupancy rate. Its census fell from 104 to 15 in two years. This level of decline typically signals imminent closure.

Where Decline Is Concentrated

Texas leads with 63 facilities showing decline signals, followed closely by Illinois with 62. California has 36, Florida 25, and Missouri 22. These five states account for more than a third of all flagged facilities.

The Chain Story: Big Operators, Big Differences

ChainFacilitiesStatesRatingTurnover
The Ensign Group324173.246.5%
PACS Group251162.947.7%
Genesis Healthcare197192.446.4%
Life Care Centers194263.542.1%
Creative Solutions14912.651.6%

Life Care Centers of America operates across the most states (26) and carries the highest average rating (3.5) among the top chains with the lowest turnover at 42.1%. Genesis Healthcare averages just 2.4 stars across 197 facilities.

Nationally, nursing home chains carry $492 million in total fines with average turnover of 46.4% and 3.9 total nurse hours per resident per day.

Staffing: 2.1 Million Workers

Payroll Based Journal data for Q3 2025 reveals 2.1 million unique employees logged 514 million work hours across all 53 reporting states and territories.

National average staff turnover sits at 46.4% — meaning nearly half of nursing staff leave their positions each year. While this is an improvement from the 52.7% seen in March 2024, it remains far above sustainable levels.

The For-Profit Question

73.7% of all facilities are for-profit, split between corporations (33.4%), LLCs (33.0%), individuals (4.5%), and partnerships (2.8%). Nonprofits account for 19.9% and government-run facilities just 6.4%.

This matters because the entity transfer patterns we're seeing — facilities being passed between LLC shell entities while carrying 1-star ratings and hundreds of thousands in fines — are overwhelmingly concentrated in the for-profit sector.

What to Watch

The national averages tell a story of gradual recovery. But behind every improving average are individual facilities where census is collapsing, staff are leaving, and fines are accumulating. Those are the ones that matter most — because they're where real people live.

Data Sources

CMS Care Compare Provider Data · Chain Performance Measures · PBJ Employee Detail (Q3 2025) · MDS Quality (Q4 2025) · Form 671 (Q4 2025) · Provider of Services iQIES (Q4 2025). All from data.cms.gov.

Methodology

Decline scores are composite indicators based on census change, occupancy, rating decline, fine levels, fine growth, turnover, SFF status, abuse flags, deficiency counts, and ownership instability.